Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
    Communities & Collections
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    People
    Organizations
    Statistics
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Chung Shan Medical University
  3. Pure學術人才庫轉入
  4. Pre-fieldwork core competencies for mental health occupational therapy students in Taiwan under conditions of volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity
 
  • Details
Options

Pre-fieldwork core competencies for mental health occupational therapy students in Taiwan under conditions of volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity

Other Title
A Delphi method
Journal
British Journal of Occupational Therapy
Date Issued
2026-09-01
Author(s)
CHIA-HUI HUNG  
WEN-CHOU CHI  
SHIH-CHEN FAN  
DOI
10.1177/03080226251412755
URI
https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105029563497
https://scholars.csmu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/29451
Abstract
Introduction: In mental health occupational therapy (MHOT) fieldwork, the volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity (VUCA) environment poses challenges for students. The present study, conducted in Taiwan, aimed to identify pre-fieldwork core competencies essential for preparing occupational therapy undergraduates for mental health fieldwork, with a focus on professional readiness and resilience. Methods: A two-round Delphi survey was conducted with MHOT fieldwork instructors across Taiwan. Round 1 included 14 experts (10 completed) and generated preliminary items through qualitative analysis. Round 2 involved 20 experts (16 completed) who rated item appropriateness and agreement. Consensus was evaluated using descriptive statistics and predefined thresholds. Results: Expert consensus confirmed 15 pre-fieldwork core competencies; each meeting established subjective criteria (median, interquartile range, standard deviation). Content validity ratios exceeded 0.49, averaging 0.76. The Percentage of Positive Ratings ranged from 52.94% to 94.12%, averaging 82.75%, surpassing the 70% threshold. Kendall’s W showed moderate agreement for definition appropriateness (0.494, p < 0.000) and overall agreement (0.34, p < 0.000). Metrics for convergence, consensus and stability (0.34–0.85) confirmed strong expert alignment. Conclusions: The framework comprises 11 core and 4 adaptive competencies, organised into 5 domains, and provides a practice-oriented blueprint for early clinical preparation in VUCA-challenged mental health settings.
Type
journal article
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback