Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
    Communities & Collections
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    People
    Organizations
    Statistics
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Administrative Units/行政單位
  3. School History Room/校史室
  4. 校院出版品
  5. 中山醫學雜誌
  6. Comparison of the Distress Thermometer, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Depression and Somatic Symptom Scale for Screening Psychiatric Disorders in Hospitalized Cancer Patients
 
  • Details
Options

Comparison of the Distress Thermometer, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Depression and Somatic Symptom Scale for Screening Psychiatric Disorders in Hospitalized Cancer Patients

Journal Volume
中山醫學雜誌 ; 33卷1期 (2022 / 06 / 01) , P33 - 42
Date Issued
2022-10-21T03:24:59Z
URI
https://scholars.csmu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/8608
Abstract
Purpose: This study assesses the sensitivity and specificity of the distress thermometer (DT), the hospital anxiety and the depression scale (HADS), and depression and somatic symptoms scale (DSSS) for screening psychiatric disorders in hospitalized cancer patients by comparing with the clinical interview. Methods: DT, HADS, and DSSS were evaluated in 160 hospitalized cancer patients prior to the psychiatric interview. Each scale was tested against clinical psychiatric diagnoses based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition for sensitivity and specificity. Results: The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified a DT score of 5 as the optimal cut-off point versus clinical psychiatric diagnoses, with sensitivity and specificity of 77% and 100%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC=0.93) was the largest for DT. HADS and DSSS have similar AUC (0.84 vs 0.84, p=0.90). Among all subscales, the DSSS-depression scale had an AUC of 0.86, which yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 80%, respectively. Conclusion: DT, DSSS, and HADS had acceptable screening efficacy for psychiatric disorders in cancer patients. We recommend the use of DT and DSSS as an optimal two-step psychiatric screening tool in cancer patients. More studies are needed to verify the value of DSSS in evaluating the treatment response of cancer patients comorbid with psychiatric diagnosis.
Type
article
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Comparison of the Distress Thermometer, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Depression and Somati.pdf

Size

543.92 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):4d44170495e6255ff84bd5ee824d639b

Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback