在職身心障礙者求職時是否會遭受不平等對待

目的本研究探討臺灣在職中的身心障礙者在求職時是否會遭受不平等對待之間的相關性，期望能為身心障礙者有所助益。方法本研究利用數據取自勞動部資料庫進行分析，利用「108年身心障礙者勞動狀況調查」資料，探討在職身心障礙者在求職過程中是否遭受到不平等對待，且納入其他干擾因子，如：新制身心障礙類別、障礙等級、性別、身分別、年齡、居住地、教育程度、婚姻狀態、是否參加過政府或公司辦理的職業訓練共9個項目。以次數和百分比(N,%)描述人力及勞動力狀況、卡方檢定、邏輯斯迴歸分析在求職時是否遭遇不平等對待與其他變項間的關係。結果研究結果顯示有進而分析後發現63.25%的人找工作或面試有受到不平等對待，經邏輯斯迴歸分別並區分新制身心障礙分類，影響面試時受到不平等對待均與4項因素呈顯著關係。新制身心障礙類別第二類(OR=0.229, P<0.001)、第三類(OR=0.318,P<0.001)、第四類(OR=2.766,P=0.001)、第七類(OR =1.426,P =0.003)、第五類(OR=5.448, P =0.025)v.s第一類；性別男性(OR=1.279,P=0.005) v.s女性；45-54歲年齡組別(OR=0.551,P<0.001)、65歲及以上組別(OR=0.489, P<0.001)、55-64歲年齡組別(OR=0.608,P=0.002)v.s15-24歲年齡組別；有參加過政府或公司辦的職業訓練(OR=0.755倍,P=0.005) )v.s沒參加過政府或公司辦的職業訓練。

Objective:This study focuses on the correlation between unfair treatment and the Job seekers with disabilities.Methods:Logistic regression analyses were conducted using the variable. “Does people with disabilities receive unfair treatment when seeking employment” as the dependent variable. Factors include disability categories, disability level, gender, person status , age, place of residence , educational attainment , marital status, whether disabilities participated in vocational training.Results:Of the 147,864 respondents ,63.25% disabilities treated unfairly when seeking employment. Results from logistic regression analysis identified the following four factors significantly associated :Disability categories, Sensory Functions & Pain；The Eye, Ear and Related Structures(OR=0.229, P<0.001),Functions & Structures of/involved in Voice and Speech(OR=0.318,P<0.001),Functions & Structures of/related to the Cardiovascular, Haematological , Immunological and Respiratory Systems(OR=2.766,P=0.001), Neuromusculoskeletal and Movement related Functions & Structures(OR=1.426,P =0.003),Functions & Structures of/related to the Digestive, Metabolic and Endocrine Systems(OR=5.448, P =0.025) v.s Mental Functions & Structures of the Nervous System, and being male(OR=1.279,P=0.005)v.s woman, and were among 45-54 age group (OR=0.551,P<0.001)、≧65 age group (OR=0.489, P<0.001)、55-64 age group (OR=0.608,P=0.002) v.s 15-24 age group, and had participated in vocational training( OR=0.755,P=0.005) v.s never participated in vocational training.