Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
    Communities & Collections
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    People
    Organizations
    Statistics
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine /醫學院
  3. School of Medicine /醫學系
  4. Dronedarone vs. placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter across a range of renal function: a<i>post hoc</i>analysis of the ATHENA trial
 
  • Details
Options

Dronedarone vs. placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter across a range of renal function: a<i>post hoc</i>analysis of the ATHENA trial

Journal
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
Journal Volume
8
Journal Issue
4
Start Page
363-371
ISSN
2055-6837
2055-6845
Date Issued
2021-12-27
Author(s)
Mate Vamos
Jonas Oldgren
Gi-Byoung Nam
Gregory Y H Lip
Hugh Calkins
Jun Zhu
Kwo-Chang Ueng  
Ulf Ludwigs
Mattias Wieloch
John Stewart
Stefan H Hohnloser
DOI
10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab090
URI
https://scholars.csmu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/4575
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims</jats:title><jats:p>Use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is challenging owing to issues with renal clearance, drug accumulation, and increased proarrhythmic risks. Because CKD is a common comorbidity in patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL), it is important to establish the efficacy and safety of AAD treatment in patients with CKD.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods and results</jats:title><jats:p>Dronedarone efficacy and safety in individuals with AF/AFL and varying renal functionality [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): ≥60, ≥45 and &lt;60, and &lt;45 mL/min] was investigated in a post hoc analysis of ATHENA (NCT00174785), a randomized, double-blind trial of dronedarone vs. placebo in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF/AFL plus additional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. Log-rank testing and Cox regression were used to compare the incidence of endpoints between treatments. Overall, 4588 participants were enrolled from the trial. There was no interaction between treatment group and baseline eGFR assessed as a continuous variable (P = 0.743) for the first CV hospitalization or death from any cause (primary outcome). This outcome was lower with dronedarone vs. placebo across a wide range of renal function. First CV hospitalization and first AF/AFL recurrence were both lower in the two least renally impaired subgroups with dronedarone vs. placebo. Treatment emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were more frequent with dronedarone vs. placebo and occurred more often in patients with severe renal impairment.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Dronedarone is an effective AAD in patients with AF/AFL and CV risk factors across a wide range of renal function.</jats:p></jats:sec>
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback