非輸卵管阻塞性之女性不孕症病因治療

由於基層診所設備不足，卻又往往須面對不孕症治療。今日雖人工助孕生殖技術發達，但往往花費金錢及耗時，病人配合度差，其成功率亦約四成左右，又有OHSS及多胞胎妊娠紋之危險性。故本人利用開業臨床病例67例，分成A、B、C、D四組。依病人之接受度及喜好決定人數，A組只用西醫療法，B組用西醫加中醫，C組用西醫、中醫、外加針灸，D組則只純用中醫方法。用本人所設計之評分做治療性之指標。結果發現A組成功率65%，B組成功率72.2%，C組成功率70.59%，D組成功率58.33%。由圖表中看出A、B於第二、三個月成功率較高，而C組於第一個月成功率較高，D組於第三個月成功率較高。B、C組用針灸成功率差不多，但針灸似乎有使受孕成功提早之作用，利用此評分做指標，發現病人分數接近70分往往能成功季經濟，又能於基層醫療院所用此法。(療程六個月)

I use clinical patient included 67 cases then give them to nfoure group analysis. A group use medical therapy B group use medical therapy with china a medical drug. C group use medical therapy with china a medical drug and Arcupunture. D group just use china medical drug therapy. I find that the 67 cases must use score method and use the score to give me a guide to us what drug suit for patient. After 6 month treatment and care. I get that A group has 65%; B group has 72.2%; C group has 70.59%; D group has 58.33% successful rate. The issue is fit for clinical doctor to threat in fertility about famal.