Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
    Communities & Collections
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    People
    Organizations
    Statistics
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Chung Shan Medical University
  3. Pure學術人才庫轉入
  4. Reduced-port robotic pancreatectomy
 
  • Details
Options

Reduced-port robotic pancreatectomy

Other Title
a narrative review of the literature
Journal
Laparoscopic Surgery
Date Issued
2023-01-30
Author(s)
CHENG-MING PENG  
DOI
10.21037/LS-22-47
URI
https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85147375611
https://scholars.csmu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/32908
Abstract
Background and Objective: Minimally invasive pancreatectomy (MIP) has been increasingly performed in recent years. While the introduction of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) was straightforward, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) was perceived as technically challenging due its complexity. However, robotic surgical innovation made concrete the feasibility of robotic pancreatectomy. These technological reforms have led to surgeons advocating for reduced-port surgery (RPS) for reduced procedure invasiveness. However, there are fewer reports on reduced-port robotic pancreatectomy (RPRP) than on other types of robotic surgery. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has lagged behind most in this area due to the complexity of pancreatectomy. In this narrative review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of RPRP. Methods: Original manuscripts on RPRP, written in English and published before May 30, 2022, were searched for in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Keywords included “single-port”, “single-site”, or “single-incision” robotic pancreatectomies. Key Content and Findings: The search revealed seven studies reporting 104 cases of RPRP, including 59 and 45 cases of distal pancreatectomy (DP) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), respectively. Although there were only two studies comparing reduced-port laparoscopic pancreatectomies and open or laparoscopic pancreatectomy, perioperative outcomes were acceptable for both DP and PD. Only five patients in this review required conversion to multi-port or open surgery (4.8%). Although the small number of material papers in this review may not conclusively guide the next steps in this surgery, we found no evidence to disprove the feasibility of RPRP. Conclusions: Based on the results of further comparative studies with conventional robotic pancreatectomy, we hope that RPRP will become more widely used in the future.
Type
journal article
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback