Determinants of nerve conduction recovery after nerve injuries

Introduction: The aims of this study were to determine the influences of: (1) timing of nerve decompression; and (2) nerve fiber types on the patterns of nerve conduction studies (NCS) after nerve injury. Methods: Nerve conduction studies (NCS) were performed on 3 models of nerve injury: (1) crush injury due to transient nerve compression (crush group); (2) chronic constriction injury (CCI), or permanent compression (CCI group); and (3) CCI with removal of ligatures, or delayed nerve decompression (De-CCI group). Results: There were distinct patterns of NCS recovery. The crush and De-CCI groups achieved similar motor nerve recovery, better than that of the CCI group. In contrast, recovery of sensory nerves was limited in the CCI and De-CCI groups and was lower than in the crush group. Conclusions: Immediate relief of compression resulted in the best recovery of motor and sensory nerve conduction. In contrast, delayed decompression restored only motor nerve conduction.