Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
    Communities & Collections
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    People
    Organizations
    Statistics
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Chung Shan Medical University
  3. Pure學術人才庫轉入
  4. Diagnostic performance of serum cystatin c and serum creatinine in the prediction of chronic kidney disease in renal transplant recipients
 
  • Details
Options

Diagnostic performance of serum cystatin c and serum creatinine in the prediction of chronic kidney disease in renal transplant recipients

Journal
Transplantation Proceedings
Date Issued
2010-12-01
Author(s)
SHENG-WEN WU  
TUNG-WEI HUNG  
HORNG-RONG CHANG  
DOI
10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.09.150
URI
https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/78650464224
https://scholars.csmu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/34313
Abstract
Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has adverse impacts on mortality and morbidity of renal transplant recipients. Serum cystatin C (sCysC) is a novel marker in predicting the CKD. We therefore compare sCysC and serum creatinine (sCr) with the aim of improving the detection of CKD in renal transplant recipients. Methods We enrolled 106 renal transplant recipients and estimated glomerular filtration rates (GFR) using the Cockcroft-Gault (GFR CG) and the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (GFR aMDRD) formulae. We defined CKD as the presence of structural or functional kidney damage, irrespective of the diagnosis. Comparisons of sCysC and sCr in detecting CKD were analyzed. Results sCysC correlates with sCr significantly (r = 0.87; P < .001). The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrates that sCysC has a better specificity and area under the curve, but less sensitivity than sCr in predicting CKD in renal transplant recipients if GFR is estimated by GFR CG. Additionally, if GFR was estimated by GFR aMDRD, the role of sCysC or sCr in prediction of CKD was comparable. Conclusion sCysC may be better than sCr to detect CKD in renal transplant recipients using the GFR CG.
Type
journal article
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback