Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
    Communities & Collections
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    People
    Organizations
    Statistics
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Chung Shan Medical University
  3. Pure學術人才庫轉入
  4. One-year outcomes of an innovative laparoscopic pectopexy procedure using inverted T-mesh for treatment of advanced uterine and anterior vaginal prolapse
 
  • Details
Options

One-year outcomes of an innovative laparoscopic pectopexy procedure using inverted T-mesh for treatment of advanced uterine and anterior vaginal prolapse

Journal
Scientific Reports
Date Issued
2026-12-01
Author(s)
TSUNG-HO YING  
TSUNG-HSIEN LEE  
MAN-JUNG HUNG  
DOI
10.1038/s41598-026-40730-0
URI
https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105034810410
https://scholars.csmu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/24726
Abstract
This prospective pilot study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an innovative laparoscopic pectopexy (LP) technique employing an inverted T-mesh for the concomitant treatment of advanced uterine and anterior vaginal prolapse. 42 patients (62.7%) underwent the innovative LP procedure, while 25 patients (37.3%) with predominant uterine or vaginal vault prolapse underwent conventional laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy or colpopexy (LS). The primary outcome was the anatomic outcomes and functional results. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications and reoperations. At baseline, the demographics of the LP group was younger, with lower body mass index (BMI), and were more sexually active when compared to the LS group (P < 0.05). At one-year follow-up, the anatomic cure rate (POP-Q stage < 2) was significantly lower in the LP group (78.6% [33/42] vs. 92.0% [23/25]; P = 0.0108). Functional outcomes were assessed using the PFDI-20, POPIQ-7 and PISQ-12 questionnaires, and significant improvements were observed in all domains. Multiple logistic regression revealed that the type of surgical procedure was not a significant predictor of outcome. Levator avulsion was the only variable significantly associated with poorer results (P < 0.05). Both groups demonstrated favorable postoperative outcomes, and had no severe surgical complications. Limitations of this study included non-randomization of the sample groups, small sample size and a follow-up time of one year. Despite these limitations, the findings suggest that the innovative LP procedure is a safe and feasible option for the concomitant management of advanced uterine and anterior vaginal prolapse. However, levator ani avulsion markedly increases the risk of anatomic recurrence. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07411898; 13/02/2026).
Type
journal article
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback