Options
Efficacy of adalimumab combined with Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F in the treatment of patient with rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter, openālabel, randomizedācontrolled trial
Journal
International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases
Journal Volume
27
Journal Issue
1
ISSN
1756-1841
1756-185X
Date Issued
2024-01
Author(s)
Feng Luo
ShuoāYan Gau
Yuāxia Wu
Houāli Liao
Fang Tang
Qin Zhong
Ying Huang
Lei Hou
Zhengāqi Liu
Jinālong Cai
Yueāpeng Cao
Daoāmin Lu
Yang An
Weiāya Lan
Can Liu
Changāming Chen
Erātao Jia
Xueāming Yao
Wuākai Ma
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) combined with <jats:italic>Tripterygium wilfordii</jats:italic> Hook F (TwHF) in the treatment of methotrexate (MTX)āinadequate response patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>In this multicenter, openālabel, randomized controlled clinical trial, 64 RA patients with inadequate response to MTX were 1:1 randomly assigned into treatment or control groups. The treatment group was treated with ADA in combination with TwHF, and the control group was treated with ADA in combination with MTX for 24āweeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients having low disease activity (2.6āā¤āDAS28āESRā<ā3.2) and remission rates (DAS28āESRā<ā2.6) at week 24.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>In total, 53 of the 64 patients (82.8%) completed this 24āweek clinical trial. By intentātoātreat (ITT) analysis, a comparable outcome was observed between the two groups. The percentage of patients achieving low disease activity in the treatment group and control group were 43.8% and 46.9% (95% CI, 21.28 to 27.48, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic>ā=ā.802). Percentage of patients achieving low disease activity rates were respectively 28.1% and 31.3% in the treatment group and control group (95% CI, 19.18 to 25.58, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic>ā=ā.784). In perāprotocol (PP) analysis, the results were consistent with the ITT model. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the two groups.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>There were no significant differences in efficacy and safety between ADA combined with TwHF versus ADA combined with MTX in the treatment of RA. TwHF might be an alternative treatment for RA patients who are intolerant to MTX.</jats:p></jats:sec>
SDGs
Publisher
Wiley
Type
journal-article