Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
    Communities & Collections
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    People
    Organizations
    Statistics
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Chung Shan Medical University
  3. Pure學術人才庫轉入
  4. Machine Learning Algorithms for ccRCC Data Analysis
 
  • Details
Options

Machine Learning Algorithms for ccRCC Data Analysis

Date Issued
2022-01-01
Author(s)
HUI-CHING WU  
MING-HSENG TSENG  
DOI
10.1109/ECBIOS54627.2022.9945034
URI
https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85143134063
https://scholars.csmu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/34353
Abstract
Malignant tumors are one of the top ten causes of death worldwide. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common renal cell carcinoma. Discovering latent factors through genetic testing help diagnose the disease. Due to the complexity of proteomics, we used machine learning models to classify the disease and choose proteins with important features, in order to reduce irrelevant detection. We used different machine learning methods, including logistic regression (LR), support vector classification (SVC), and random forest classifier (RFC) for feature selection with different classification algorithms, e.g., SVC, XGBoost, and Multilayer Perceptron, to predict diseases. Differences among various machine learning methods were compared to improve classification accuracy and present key features. The ccRCC dataset with 11,817 proteins and 194 patients was used for model development. According to the evaluation, LR and RFC showed a larger area in the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), compared to SVC. In the LR ccRCC dataset, the feature selection method achieved an AUC of 0.995 while the RFC feature selection method of RFC achieved AUC up to 0.996. By comparing different classification algorithms with the RFC feature selection method, RFC, XGBoost, and LR achieved AUCs of 0.996, 0.995, and 0.992, respectively, where LR has the lowest AUC score. However, using the LR classifier model with the LR feature selection method achieved an AUC of 0.995. These results demonstrated that different machine learning algorithms must be matched with different feature selection methods to classify data.
Type
journal article
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback