Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
    Communities & Collections
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    People
    Organizations
    Statistics
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Chung Shan Medical University
  3. Pure學術人才庫轉入
  4. Triplet combination of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in previously treated, relapsed ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma
 
  • Details
Options

Triplet combination of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in previously treated, relapsed ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma

Other Title
An experience in Taiwan
Journal
Gynecologic Oncology
Date Issued
2004-08-01
Author(s)
MAN-JUNG HUNG  
DOI
10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.017
URI
https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/3543089799
https://scholars.csmu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/32318
Abstract
Objective. The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (GCP) combination as salvage therapy in patients with relapsed ovarian or peritoneal cancer who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients and Methods. Patients with progressive ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Gemcitabine was administered at 800 mg/m 2 as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8; carboplatin (AUC of 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m 2) were administered as 60-min and 3-h intravenous infusions, respectively, on day 1. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of nine cycles. Results. Twenty patients (ovarian carcinoma, 19; peritoneal carcinoma, 1) received this triplet regimen as salvage therapy. All the patients had previously received at least one platinum-based regimen for chemotherapy and 17 of them had received platinum plus paclitaxel. The median number of previous regimens was 2 (range, 1-4), and the median platinum-free interval was 9 months (range, 1-18). A total of 130 cycles were administered with a median of six cycles per patient (range, 3-9). The overall response rate was 75%, including 12 complete responses (60%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 36.1-80.9) and three partial responses (15%; 95% CI, 3.2-37.9). The other five patients showed stable disease (25%; 95% CI, 8.7-49.1). The median duration of the progression-free survival was 6.5 months (range, 3-20). Myelosuppression was the main toxicity, with leukopenia being the most prominent (grade 3/4 toxicity in 35% patients), followed by thrombocytopenia in 20% patients. In addition, 35% patients had grade 3 anemia. All the toxicities were manageable and the patients recovered fully. Among non-hematological toxicities, the only notable one was grades 2 and 3 hepatic toxicity seen in two and one patients, respectively, necessitating a decrease in the paclitaxel dose in two patients. Conclusions. GCP combination is an effective salvage chemotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated and relapsed ovarian and peritoneal cancer. The significant side effects of myelosuppression and hepatic toxicity were of moderate severity and manageable.
Type
journal article
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback