Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
    Communities & Collections
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    People
    Organizations
    Statistics
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine /醫學院
  3. School of Medicine /醫學系
  4. <i>α</i>‐Glucosidase Inhibitor Can Effectively Inhibit the Risk of Tuberculosis in Patients with Diabetes: A Nested Case‐Control Study
 
  • Details
Options

<i>α</i>‐Glucosidase Inhibitor Can Effectively Inhibit the Risk of Tuberculosis in Patients with Diabetes: A Nested Case‐Control Study

Journal
BioMed Research International
Journal Volume
2020
Journal Issue
1
ISSN
2314-6133
2314-6141
Date Issued
2020-01
Author(s)
Kai-Huang Lin
Ci-Wen Luo
Shih-Pin Chen  
Dom-Gene Tu
Ming-Shian Lin
Yu-Hsiang Kuan  
Editor(s)
Paola Di Carlo
DOI
10.1155/2020/8085106
URI
https://scholars.csmu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/3998
Abstract
<jats:p>Diabetes mellitus (DM) and tuberculosis (TB) are major public health and economic burdens. DM increases Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) infection rates and treatment durations. This study evaluated the relationship between five classes of oral DM medications and TB infection risk in DM patients. We used longitudinal records from the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Research Database. DM patients were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM) code 250 and A code A181. TB patients were identified using ICD‐9‐CM code 010.x‐017.x. Oral DM medications were divided into five classes: sulfonylureas, biguanides, meglitinides, <jats:italic>α</jats:italic>‐glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs), and thiazolidinediones. Users were classified as nonusers, low‐concentration users, and high‐concentration users. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) was derived using multivariate Poisson regression to calculate the relative risk of TB infection. DM patients using low‐ and high‐concentration AGIs had significantly lower TB infection risks compared with nonusers. The IRRs of the sulfonylureas and AGI users were [CI] 0.693–0.948) and (95% CI 0.651–0.995), respectively. The other four classes of medications exhibited no significant effect on TB infection risk in DM patients. Furthermore, DM patients using high‐concentration AGIs had a significantly lower TB infection risk compared with those using low‐concentration AGIs (IRR 0.918, 95% CI: 0.854–0.987). We noted a dose‐response relationship in the effects of DM medications on TB risk. Accordingly, we suggest that DM patients use AGIs to benefit from their protective effect on TB infection risk.</jats:p>
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Publisher
Wiley
Type
journal-article
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback