以市集推動多元性別平權之經驗探究：以基好事吉為例

台灣的多元性別平權相關的法令政策正在逐步推展，然而社會大眾對於多元性別族群的歧視仍然存在。本研究旨在探討以市集形式推廣多元性別平權之基好事吉的實踐經驗，此市集透過融入日常生活與性別展演等方式，促進社會對多元性別的理解和接納。本研究內容包括基好事吉的策略、轉變歷程、參與者經驗、執行困境及對社會工作的啟示等。研究方法係以半結構方式進行9位參與基好事吉的工作人員的訪談，再進行主題式分析。本研究結果發現基好事吉之策略轉變從初期的建立安全包容環境，中期轉至戶外並與藝文活動結合，到現今拓展至外縣市並加強培力。有關基好事吉對於工作人員個人層面的影響，工作人員透過市集參與提升了自我認同及培養專業技能等；對於組織的影響則是能看見多元性別社群的需求、建立組織口碑和擴展組織間互助關係。活動中的非預期經驗反映出多元性別群體對外界友善態度的保守傾向。關於執行困境，基好事吉面臨公益與商業定位的混亂、政府規範不一致、經費不足、工作流程不明確、社會工作者定位混淆和志工流失等挑戰。基好事吉給予社會工作的啟示強調提升多元性別敏感度、加強衝突溝通技能、強化整合資源能力、聆聽社群內外的聲音以及創新實踐等，以促進更多異質群體間的對話來逐步消除隔閡。本研究建議主辦單位應建立明確的工作分配、加強人才培訓以及持續探索創新的議題表達方式等。政府應政策透明一致，並對多元性別平權增加資源投入。對於未來研究建議可以納入對多元性別議題持反對意見的研究對象，以及進行市集長期影響評估等。

The laws and policies related to gender equality in Taiwan are gradually being promoted, but discrimination against LGBT groups still exists among the general public. The aim of this study is to explore the practical experience of Good Market which has promoted gender equality in the form of a marketplace. Good Market promotes social understanding and acceptance of gender diversity through integration into daily life and gender performances. The content of this study includes strategies, transformation process, participant experiences, difficulties in implementation, and inspirations for social work of Good Market. The research method used semi-structured interviews with 9 staff members participating in Good Market, followed by a thematic analysis.The results of this study found that the strategy of Good Market has shifted from establishing a safe and inclusive environment in the early stage, to combining outdoor activities with cultural and artistic activities in the middle stage, and now expanding to other counties and cities and strengthening empowerment. Regarding the impact of Good Market on the personal level of staff, staff have improved their self-identity and developed professional skills through marketplace participation. The impact on organizations is to see the needs of diverse gender communities, establish organizational reputation, and expand mutual aid relationships between organizations. The unexpected experiences in activities reflect the conservative tendencies of LGBT groups towards a friendly attitude of external groups. Regarding the difficulties in implementation, Good Market faces challenges such as confusion in public welfare and commercial positioning, inconsistent government regulations, insufficient funding, unclear workflow, confusion in the positioning of social workers, and loss of volunteers. The inspiration that Good Market provides to social work emphasizes enhancing sensitivity to gender diversity, improving conflict communication skills, strengthening the ability to integrate resources, listening to voices inside and outside the community, and using innovative practices, etc., in order to promote more dialogues between heterogeneous groups and gradually eliminate barriers. This study suggests that the organizers should establish clear work assignments, strengthen personnel training, and continuously explore innovative ways of expressing issues. The government should have transparent and consistent policies, and increase resource investment in gender equality. Future research is suggested to include research subjects with opposing views on gender equality and conduct long-term assessments of marketplace impact.