Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
    Communities & Collections
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    People
    Organizations
    Statistics
  • English
  • 中文
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Chung Shan Medical University
  3. Pure學術人才庫轉入
  4. Training Benefits and Motor Unit Remodeling after Ischemic Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Low-Level Laser Preexposure
 
  • Details
Options

Training Benefits and Motor Unit Remodeling after Ischemic Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Low-Level Laser Preexposure

Journal
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Date Issued
2026-02-01
Author(s)
YI-CHING CHEN  
DOI
10.1249/MSS.0000000000003860
URI
https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105027448549
https://scholars.csmu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/26596
Abstract
Purpose: – Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with blood flow restriction (BFR) is a promising strategy to prevent muscle atrophy when resistance training is not feasible, though its efficacy may be limited by fatigue. This study examined whether low-level laser therapy (LLLT) can serve as an ergogenic aid during combined NMES-BFR training. Methods: – Thirty adults were assigned to BFR or BFR + LLLT groups (n = 15). Both groups underwent a 3-week wrist extension training on the nondominant limb using combined NMES and BFR. The BFR + LLLT group received 60 J of 850 nm laser therapy to the extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) before each session; the BFR group received sham treatment. Outcomes included maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and 40% MVC submaximal force-tracking, with electromyography recorded from the ECRL and extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) muscles. Results: – The BFR + LLLT group exhibited a greater posttest/pretest MVC ratio (1.154 ± 0.127) than the control group (1.040 ± 0.058) (P = 0.004). Although the post-/pretest ratio of force-tracking error did not differ between groups (P > 0.05), training-related changes in motor unit discharge strategies in the ECRL and ECRB were more pronounced in the BFR + LLLT group. Following training, the BFR + LLLT group exhibited a steeper regression slope between the interspike interval and recruitment threshold in both muscles (P < 0.001), a pattern that was less evident in the BFR group. In addition, the post-/pretest ratio of the common drive index (CDI) within and between the ECRL and ECRB muscles decreased in the BFR + LLLT group, in contrast to a significant training-related increase observed in the BFR group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: – Pre-exposure to LLLT enhances force output after BFR–NMES training and improves neuromuscular efficiency by increasing motor synergy flexibility, thereby preserving force scaling during submaximal contractions.
Type
journal article
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback