江炳焱Ping-Yen Chiang呂文賢Wen-Shyan Leu醫學研究所2026-10-289999-12-311999https://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/25pfaxhttps://scholars.csmu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/34869電腦已普遍使用於認知領域的治療上，雖尚未有足夠的證據顯示使用電腦訓練可以有效改善單側忽略病患之問題，但有鑑於在使用平面的線二等分測驗為評估工具時發現，左側忽略之病患，提供其左側之視覺刺激，或導引其右手之左向動作都可以有效改善病患在線二等分測驗上之表現。因此，本研究乃試圖探討在電腦螢幕上提供左側之視覺刺激及導引病患右手之左向動作，是否可以有效改善病患在電腦螢幕上之線二等分測驗之表現？ 本研究採用重覆施測中和平衡的研究設計，共十二位右腦傷之個案參與本研究，每一個案經由不同順序完成三種不同導引情況之測試：情況(一)：沒有導引；情況(二)：提供左側之視覺刺激；情況(三)：再加上右手之左向動作。採用SPSS統計軟體之重覆施測變異數分析模式，結果顯示：個案在情況(三)，其線二等分測驗之偏誤值比在情況(二)或情況(一)時小，並具有統計上之顯著差異；個案在情況(二)的表現與情況(一)比較，其線二等分之偏誤值雖未達統計上之顯著差異，但其效應值r仍達0.39，顯示單純呈現左側之視覺導引仍有其效應。Computerized programs were popularly used in cognitive therapy recently. Although no sufficient evidences have showed the benefits of computer training to the neglect patients. The left visual cueing and left-sided movement on desk have witnessed the effects to neglect patients' performances in line bisection test on the same plane. This study was trying to explore the effects of visual cueing and left-sided movement on screen to the performances of neglect patients in computerized line bisection test. The repeated measure counter-balance method was designed and twelve patients with right brain damaged engaged in this study. Each one completed three conditions by different sequences. Condition (A): no cueing; Condition (B): left visual cueing; Condition (C): left visual cueing plus left-sided movement. The repeated measure ANOVA analysis modal in SPSS was used to calculate the differences between three conditions. The results showed that significant differences in bias of line bisection test were between condition (C) and condition (B) and condition (A). Though no significant differences were between condition (B) and condition (A). The effect size r between both reached 0.39. It showed that the effects of simple visual cueing were existed.電腦忽略導引復健computerneglectcueingrehabilitationthesis