KAI-SUNG WANGSHIH-HSIEN CHANG2026-10-162026-10-162010-08-01Pure ID: 15243463Pure UUID: c695019b-2516-4cd2-81d9-ea79543219aa10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.022https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/77953292016https://scholars.csmu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/23742Treatment of a basic dye, methylene blue, by electrochemical oxidation, fly ash adsorption, and combined electrochemical oxidation-fly ash adsorption was compared. Methylene blue at 100mgL-1 was used in this study. The toxicity was also monitored by the Vibrio fischeri light inhibition test.When electrochemical oxidation was used, 99% color and 84% COD were removed from the methylene blue solution in 20min at a current density of 428Am-2, NaCl of 1000mgL-1, and pH0 of 7. However, the decolorized solution showed high toxicity (100% light inhibition).For fly ash adsorption, a high dose of fly ash (>20,000mgL-1) was needed to remove methylene blue, and the Freundlich isotherm described the adsorption behavior well.In the combined electrochemical oxidation-fly ash adsorption treatment, the addition of 4000mgL-1 fly ash effectively reduced intermediate toxicity and decreased the COD of the electrochemical oxidation-treated methylene blue solution. The results indicated that the combined process effectively removed color, COD, and intermediate toxicity of the methylene blue solution.7enjournal article